Ask AI
Public Law115th CongressLabor and Employment
H.J.Res. 67Became Law

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by qualified State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

This bill became law

Filed
Comm.
Floor
Both
Law

What it doesSummary public law (Apr 13, 2017)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration regarding savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

(The rule amends a final regulation that describes how states may design and operate payroll deduction savings programs for private-sector employees, including programs that use automatic enrollment, without causing the states or private-sector employers to have established employee pension benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA]. The amendment expands the regulation beyond states to cover qualified state political subdivisions and their programs that otherwise comply with the regulation.)

What just happenedApr 13, 2017

Signed by President.

Who’s behind it

Rep. Rooney, Francis [R-FL-19](R-FL)Sponsor
7 cosponsors7 R
Read on Congress.gov
7cosponsors1committees25actions3related bills5subjects
  1. Apr 13, 2017President

    Signed by President.

  2. Apr 13, 2017BecameLaw36000

    Signed by President.

  3. Apr 5, 2017Floor

    Presented to President.

  4. Apr 5, 2017President28000

    Presented to President.

  5. Mar 30, 2017Floor

    Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  6. Mar 30, 2017Floor

    Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 49. Record Vote Number: 99. (consideration: CR S2121-2122)

  7. Mar 30, 2017Floor17000

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 49. Record Vote Number: 99.(consideration: CR S2121-2122)

  8. Mar 30, 2017Floor

    Considered by Senate.

  9. Mar 29, 2017Floor

    Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S2055-2096)

  10. Mar 29, 2017Floor

    Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2055)

  11. Feb 16, 2017IntroReferral

    Received in the Senate, read twice.

  12. Feb 15, 2017FloorH38310

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  13. Feb 15, 2017FloorH37100

    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 191 (Roll no. 95). (text: CR H1218)

  14. Feb 15, 2017Floor8000

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 191 (Roll no. 95).(text: CR H1218)

  15. Feb 15, 2017FloorH30000

    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1221)

  16. Feb 15, 2017FloorH8D000

    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 67, the Chair put the question on passage and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Bonamici demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on passage until a time to be announced.

  17. Feb 15, 2017FloorH35000

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  18. Feb 15, 2017FloorH8D000

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 67.

  19. Feb 15, 2017FloorH8D000

    Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 66 and H.J. Res. 67. Each joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in each joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on each joint resolution without intervening motion except one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.

  20. Feb 15, 2017FloorH30000

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 116. (consideration: CR H1218-1221))

  21. Feb 14, 2017FloorH1L220

    Rule H. Res. 116 passed House.

  22. Feb 13, 2017FloorH1L210

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 116 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 66 and H.J. Res. 67. Each joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in each joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on each joint resolution without intervening motion except one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.

  23. Feb 7, 2017IntroReferralH11100

    Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

    Education and the Workforce Committee
  24. Feb 7, 2017IntroReferralIntro-H

    Introduced in House

  25. Feb 7, 2017IntroReferral1000

    Introduced in House

Public LawApr 13, 201749

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration regarding savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

(The rule amends a final regulation that describes how states may design and operate payroll deduction savings programs for private-sector employees, including programs that use automatic enrollment, without causing the states or private-sector employers to have established employee pension benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA]. The amendment expands the regulation beyond states to cover qualified state political subdivisions and their programs that otherwise comply with the regulation.)

Passed Senate without amendmentMar 30, 201782

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration regarding savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

(The rule amends a final regulation that describes how states may design and operate payroll deduction savings programs for private-sector employees, including programs that use automatic enrollment, without causing the states or private-sector employers to have established employee pension benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA]. The amendment expands the regulation beyond states to cover qualified state political subdivisions and their programs that otherwise comply with the regulation.)

Passed House without amendmentFeb 15, 201781

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration regarding savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

(The rule amends a final regulation that describes how states may design and operate payroll deduction savings programs for private-sector employees, including programs that use automatic enrollment, without causing the states or private-sector employers to have established employee pension benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA]. The amendment expands the regulation beyond states to cover qualified state political subdivisions and their programs that otherwise comply with the regulation.)

Introduced in HouseFeb 7, 2017

This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration regarding savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

(The rule amends a final regulation that describes how states may design and operate payroll deduction savings programs for private-sector employees, including programs that use automatic enrollment, without causing the states or private-sector employers to have established employee pension benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA]. The amendment expands the regulation beyond states to cover qualified state political subdivisions and their programs that otherwise comply with the regulation.)

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangement… — Informed