Ask AI
H.Con.Res. 165

Expressing the sense of Congress and reaffirming longstanding United States policy in support of a direct bilaterally negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and opposition to United Nations Security Council resolutions imposing a solution to the conflict.

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Expresses the sense of Congress that:

  • a sustainable peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians will come only through direct bilateral negotiations between the parties;
  • any widespread international recognition of a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood outside of the context of such a peace agreement would cause severe harm to the peace process and would likely trigger the implementation of penalties under provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 regarding limitations on assistance to support a Palestinian state and uses of funds for assistance for the West Bank and Gaza;
  • efforts by outside bodies, including the United Nations Security Council, to impose an agreement are likely to set back the cause of peace; and
  • the U.S. government should continue to oppose and veto Security Council resolutions that seek to impose solutions to final status issues or that are one-sided and anti-Israel, and should continue to support and facilitate the resumption of negotiations without preconditions toward a sustainable peace agreement.

Received in the Senate.

Rep. Royce, Edward R. [R-CA-39](R-CA)Sponsor
17 cosponsors10 D7 R
17cosponsors1committees10actions1related bills7subjects
  1. IntroReferral

    Received in the Senate.

  2. FloorH38310

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. FloorH37300

    On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text of measure as passed: CR H6345-6346)

  4. Floor8000

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text of measure as passed: CR H6345-6346)

  5. FloorH8D000

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Con. Res. 165.

  6. FloorH30000

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6345-6349)

  7. FloorH30300

    Mr. Royce moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.

  8. IntroReferralH11100

    Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    Foreign Affairs Committee
  9. IntroReferralIntro-H

    Introduced in House

  10. IntroReferral1000

    Introduced in House

Nov 29, 201681

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Expresses the sense of Congress that:

  • a sustainable peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians will come only through direct bilateral negotiations between the parties;
  • any widespread international recognition of a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood outside of the context of such a peace agreement would cause severe harm to the peace process and would likely trigger the implementation of penalties under provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 regarding limitations on assistance to support a Palestinian state and uses of funds for assistance for the West Bank and Gaza;
  • efforts by outside bodies, including the United Nations Security Council, to impose an agreement are likely to set back the cause of peace; and
  • the U.S. government should continue to oppose and veto Security Council resolutions that seek to impose solutions to final status issues or that are one-sided and anti-Israel, and should continue to support and facilitate the resumption of negotiations without preconditions toward a sustainable peace agreement.
Sep 28, 2016

Expresses the sense of Congress that:

  • a sustainable peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians will come only through direct bilateral negotiations between the parties;
  • any widespread international recognition of a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood outside of the context of such a peace agreement would cause severe harm to the peace process and would likely trigger the implementation of penalties under provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 regarding limitations on assistance to support a Palestinian state and uses of funds for assistance for the West Bank and Gaza;
  • efforts by outside bodies, including the United Nations Security Council, to impose an agreement are likely to set back the cause of peace; 
  • the U.S. government should continue to oppose and veto Security Council resolutions that seek to impose solutions to final status issues or that are one-sided and anti-Israel; and
  • the U.S. government should continue to support and facilitate the resumption of negotiations without preconditions toward a sustainable peace agreement.
Expressing the sense of Congress and reaffirming longstanding United States policy in supp… — Informed