Ask AI
Bill114th CongressFiled Apr 15, 2016Labor and Employment
H.J.Res. 87

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act".

Bill journey · stage 2 of 5

Under committee review

Filed
Comm.
Floor
Both
Law

What it doesSummary reported to house without amendment (Sep 12, 2016)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

This joint resolution disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act."

The joint resolution declares that such rule shall have no force or effect.

(Under section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203[c], which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer.)

What just happenedSep 12, 2016

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 575.

Who’s behind it

Rep. Byrne, Bradley [R-AL-1](R-AL)Sponsor
51 cosponsors51 R
Read on Congress.gov
51cosponsors1committees8actions1related bills5subjects
  1. Sep 12, 2016CalendarsH12410

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 575.

  2. Sep 12, 2016CommitteeH12200

    Reported by the Committee on Education and the Workforce. H. Rept. 114-739.

    Education and the Workforce Committee
  3. Sep 12, 2016Committee5000

    Reported by the Committee on Education and the Workforce. H. Rept. 114-739.

    Education and the Workforce Committee
  4. May 18, 2016Committee

    Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 13.

    Education and the Workforce Committee
  5. May 18, 2016Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Education and the Workforce Committee
  6. Apr 15, 2016IntroReferralH11100

    Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

    Education and the Workforce Committee
  7. Apr 15, 2016IntroReferralIntro-H

    Introduced in House

  8. Apr 15, 2016IntroReferral1000

    Introduced in House

Reported to House without amendmentSep 12, 201679

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

This joint resolution disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act."

The joint resolution declares that such rule shall have no force or effect.

(Under section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203[c], which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer.)

Introduced in HouseApr 15, 2016

This joint resolution disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act."

The joint resolution declares that such rule shall have no force or effect.

(Under section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203[c], which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer.)

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of… — Informed