Multidistrict Jurisdiction Act of 1999
Bill journey · stage 2 of 5
Under committee review
What it doesSummary passed senate amended (Oct 27, 1999)
What just happenedNov 17, 1999
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: and House requests a conference.
Who’s behind it
- Nov 17, 1999Floor
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: and House requests a conference.
- Nov 16, 1999ResolvingDifferencesH41931
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Nov 16, 1999ResolvingDifferencesH41800
The Speaker appointed conferees: Hyde, Sensenbrenner, Coble, Conyers, and Berman.
- Nov 16, 1999ResolvingDifferencesH41610
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and request a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H12020)
- Nov 16, 1999ResolvingDifferencesH40110
Mr. Sensenbrenner asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and request a conference.
- Oct 28, 1999Floor
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Oct 27, 1999Floor
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Oct 27, 1999Floor17000
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Oct 27, 1999Floor
The committee substitute agreed to by Unanimous Consent.
- Oct 27, 1999Floor
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S13326-13327)
- Oct 21, 1999Calendars
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 341.
- Oct 21, 1999Committee
Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Hatch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Judiciary Committee - Oct 21, 1999Committee14000
Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Hatch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Judiciary Committee - Oct 21, 1999Committee
Committee on Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Judiciary Committee - Sep 24, 1999Committee
Referred to Subcommittee on Oversight and Courts.
Administrative Oversight and the Courts Subcommittee - Sep 14, 1999IntroReferral
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Judiciary Committee - Sep 13, 1999FloorH38310
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sep 13, 1999FloorH37300
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
- Sep 13, 1999Floor8000
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
- Sep 13, 1999FloorH8D000
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2112.
- Sep 13, 1999FloorH30000
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8106-8109)
- Sep 13, 1999FloorH30300
Mr. Coble moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- Jul 30, 1999CalendarsH12410
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 165.
- Jul 30, 1999CommitteeH12200
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-276.
Judiciary Committee - Jul 30, 1999Committee5000
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-276.
Judiciary Committee - Jul 27, 1999CommitteeH19000
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Judiciary Committee - Jul 27, 1999CommitteeH15000-B
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Judiciary Committee - Jul 15, 1999CommitteeH23000
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee - Jul 15, 1999CommitteeH22000
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee - Jun 16, 1999CommitteeH21000
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee - Jun 14, 1999CommitteeH11000
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property.
Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee - Jun 9, 1999IntroReferralH11100
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Judiciary Committee - Jun 9, 1999IntroReferralB00100
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1182-1183)
- Jun 9, 1999IntroReferralIntro-H
Introduced in House
- Jun 9, 1999IntroReferral1000
Introduced in House
Grants Federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions arising out of a single accident that results in the death or injury of 25 or more natural persons, provided the injury has resulted in damages which exceed $75,000 per person and minimal diversity of citizenship (as prescribed in this Act) exists. Permits any person with a claim arising from such an accident to intervene as a party plaintiff, even if that person could not have brought an action in district court as an original matter. Requires a federal district court in which such an action is pending to notify the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation. Authorizes venue for such action in any district in which a defendant resides or in which a substantial part of the accident occurred.
Expands district court authority over such transferred actions to permit joint trial of liability and punitive damage issues. Calls for remand of damage determinations (other than punitive damages), including the possibility of remand to State courts in which actions were originally filed, unless the Federal court finds that it would serve the convenience of parties and witnesses and the interests of justice to retain the damages phase of the action as well.
Permits removal of actions from State to U.S. district courts to invoke the proposed jurisdiction and to join actions within the jurisdiction pending before the Federal court. Authorizes removal before trial within 30 days of a defendant's becoming a party to a suit under this Act, or at a later time with leave of the district court. Establishes a presumption in favor of discretionary remand to State courts for damages determinations after rulings on liability.
Provides that the district court in which an action under this Act is pending shall determine the source of the applicable substantive law and is not bound by the choice of law rules by any State. Requires the responsible district court to issue an order designating the jurisdiction whose law is to be applied in all actions under this Act arising from the same incident. Identifies factors that may be relevant in such choice of law determinations.
Authorizes nationwide service of process and, upon a showing of good cause, nationwide service of subpoenas with regard to actions under this Act.
Grants Federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions arising out of a single accident that results in the death or injury of 25 or more natural persons, provided the injury has resulted in damages which exceed $75,000 per person and minimal diversity of citizenship (as prescribed in this Act) exists. Permits any person with a claim arising from such an accident to intervene as a party plaintiff, even if that person could not have brought an action in district court as an original matter. Requires a federal district court in which such an action is pending to notify the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation. Authorizes venue for such action in any district in which a defendant resides or in which a substantial part of the accident occurred.
Expands district court authority over such transferred actions to permit joint trial of liability and punitive damage issues. Calls for remand of damage determinations (other than punitive damages), including the possibility of remand to State courts in which actions were originally filed, unless the Federal court finds that it would serve the convenience of parties and witnesses and the interests of justice to retain the damages phase of the action as well.
Permits removal of actions from State to U.S. district courts to invoke the proposed jurisdiction and to join actions within the jurisdiction pending before the Federal court. Authorizes removal before trial within 30 days of a defendant's becoming a party to a suit under this Act, or at a later time with leave of the district court. Establishes a presumption in favor of discretionary remand to State courts for damages determinations after rulings on liability.
Provides that the district court in which an action under this Act is pending shall determine the source of the applicable substantive law and is not bound by the choice of law rules by any State. Requires the responsible district court to issue an order designating the jurisdiction whose law is to be applied in all actions under this Act arising from the same incident. Identifies factors that may be relevant in such choice of law determinations.
Authorizes nationwide service of process and, upon a showing of good cause, nationwide service of subpoenas with regard to actions under this Act.
Multidistrict, Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act of 1999 - Amends the Federal judicial code to: (1) allow a civil action transferred for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings (multidistrict litigation) to be transferred for trial purposes by the judge or judges of the transferee district to whom the action was assigned, to the transferee or other district in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the parties and witnesses; and (2) grant Federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions arising out of a single accident that results in the death or injury of 25 or more natural persons, provided the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000 per person and minimal diversity of citizenship exists.
Authorizes venue in any district in which a defendant resides or in which a substantial part of the accident occurred.
Expands district court authority over such transferred actions (previously covered only pretrial proceedings) to permit joint trial of liability and punitive damage issues. Calls for remand of damage determinations (other than punitive damages), including the possibility of remand to State courts in which actions were originally filed, unless the Federal court finds that it would serve the convenience of parties and witnesses and the interests of justice to retain the damages phase of the action as well.
Permits removal of actions from State to U.S. district courts to invoke the proposed jurisdiction and to join actions within the jurisdiction pending before the Federal court. Authorizes removal before trial within 30 days of a defendant's becoming a party to a suit under this Act, or at a later time with leave of the district court. Establishes a presumption in favor of discretionary remand to State courts for damages determinations after rulings on liability.
Provides that the district court in which an action under this Act is pending shall determine the source of the applicable substantive law and is not bound by the choice of law rules by any State. Requires the responsible district court to issue an order designating the jurisdiction whose law is to be applied in all actions under this Act arising from the same incident. Identifies factors that may be relevant in such choice of law determinations.
Authorizes nationwide service of process and, upon a showing of good cause, nationwide service of subpoenas with regard to actions under this Act.