Ask AI
Bill114th CongressFiled Jul 21, 2015Government Operations and Politics
S. 1818

Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015

Bill journey · stage 2 of 5

Under committee review

Filed
Comm.
Floor
Both
Law

What it doesSummary reported to senate with amendment(s) (Sep 6, 2016)

Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015

(Sec. 3) This bill revises the federal agency rulemaking process to require a agencies to promulgate only rules (defined to exclude agency actions involving a military or foreign affairs function of the United States or a matter relating to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts) that are required by law, necessary to interpret a law, or made necessary by public need, to protect or improve the health and safety of the public, the environment, or the wellbeing of the people of the United States.

Before promulgating such a rule, an agency must:

  • assess the significance of the problem the agency intends to address;
  • consider the legal authority under which the rule may be proposed;
  • examine whether existing rules have created or contributed to the problem and should be modified to achieve the regulatory objective more effectively;
  • assess available alternatives to direct regulation;
  • consider the risks posed by various substances or activities within the agency's jurisdiction;
  • design the rule to maximize net benefits while justifying the costs;
  • consider incentives for innovation, consistency, predictability, flexibility, distributive impacts, and equity on the regulated entities and the public and the cost of enforcement and compliance to the government, regulated entities, and the public;
  • base decisions on the best reasonably obtainable information concerning the need for, and consequences of, the rule;
  • assess alternative forms of regulation and specify performance objectives;
  • seek views of governmental entities before imposing regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect them and seek to minimize those burdens;
  • assess the effects of rules on state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector;
  • seek to harmonize agency action with related governmental functions;
  • avoid promulgating a rule that is inconsistent, incompatible, or duplicative with other rules;
  • tailor the rule to maximize benefits while imposing the least burden on society; and
  • draft the rule in a manner that is simple and easy to understand.

Such considerations shall be included as part of the rulemaking record and shall be considered by a court only in determining whether the final rule is: (1) arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; or (2) unsupported by substantial evidence where the standard is otherwise provided by law.

This bill shall not apply:

  • to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedures, or practice;
  • if the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) waives these requirements for good cause; or
  • if the statute on which a proposed rule is based specifically exempts a rule from any of these procedures.

Judicial review of agency or OIRA compliance with this bill is limited.

(Sec. 4) Agencies must issue rules through a process that involves public participation, including by providing for timely online access to the rulemaking docket of the agency on an easily accessible federal website.

Before issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking, each agency shall seek the views of those who are likely to be affected by the rule.

(Sec. 5) In developing regulatory actions and identifying appropriate approaches, each agency shall: (1) attempt to promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization; and (2) seek to identify means to achieve regulatory goals that are designed to promote innovation.

(Sec. 6) When issuing a rule, each agency shall ensure that any scientific and technological information and processes used to support any regulatory action of the agency is the best objective, peer-reviewed, and reproducible information publicly available.

What just happenedSep 6, 2016

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 613.

Who’s behind it

Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK](R-OK)Sponsor
3 cosponsors1 D2 R
Read on Congress.gov
3cosponsors1committees7actions7subjects
  1. Sep 6, 2016Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 613.

  2. Sep 6, 2016Committee

    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-342. Additional views filed.

    Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  3. Sep 6, 2016Committee14000

    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-342. Additional views filed.

    Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  4. Oct 7, 2015Committee

    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  5. Sep 16, 2015Committee

    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.

    Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  6. Jul 21, 2015IntroReferral

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

    Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  7. Jul 21, 2015IntroReferral10000

    Introduced in Senate

Reported to Senate with amendment(s)Sep 6, 20161

Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015

(Sec. 3) This bill revises the federal agency rulemaking process to require a agencies to promulgate only rules (defined to exclude agency actions involving a military or foreign affairs function of the United States or a matter relating to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts) that are required by law, necessary to interpret a law, or made necessary by public need, to protect or improve the health and safety of the public, the environment, or the wellbeing of the people of the United States.

Before promulgating such a rule, an agency must:

  • assess the significance of the problem the agency intends to address;
  • consider the legal authority under which the rule may be proposed;
  • examine whether existing rules have created or contributed to the problem and should be modified to achieve the regulatory objective more effectively;
  • assess available alternatives to direct regulation;
  • consider the risks posed by various substances or activities within the agency's jurisdiction;
  • design the rule to maximize net benefits while justifying the costs;
  • consider incentives for innovation, consistency, predictability, flexibility, distributive impacts, and equity on the regulated entities and the public and the cost of enforcement and compliance to the government, regulated entities, and the public;
  • base decisions on the best reasonably obtainable information concerning the need for, and consequences of, the rule;
  • assess alternative forms of regulation and specify performance objectives;
  • seek views of governmental entities before imposing regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect them and seek to minimize those burdens;
  • assess the effects of rules on state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector;
  • seek to harmonize agency action with related governmental functions;
  • avoid promulgating a rule that is inconsistent, incompatible, or duplicative with other rules;
  • tailor the rule to maximize benefits while imposing the least burden on society; and
  • draft the rule in a manner that is simple and easy to understand.

Such considerations shall be included as part of the rulemaking record and shall be considered by a court only in determining whether the final rule is: (1) arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; or (2) unsupported by substantial evidence where the standard is otherwise provided by law.

This bill shall not apply:

  • to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedures, or practice;
  • if the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) waives these requirements for good cause; or
  • if the statute on which a proposed rule is based specifically exempts a rule from any of these procedures.

Judicial review of agency or OIRA compliance with this bill is limited.

(Sec. 4) Agencies must issue rules through a process that involves public participation, including by providing for timely online access to the rulemaking docket of the agency on an easily accessible federal website.

Before issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking, each agency shall seek the views of those who are likely to be affected by the rule.

(Sec. 5) In developing regulatory actions and identifying appropriate approaches, each agency shall: (1) attempt to promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization; and (2) seek to identify means to achieve regulatory goals that are designed to promote innovation.

(Sec. 6) When issuing a rule, each agency shall ensure that any scientific and technological information and processes used to support any regulatory action of the agency is the best objective, peer-reviewed, and reproducible information publicly available.

Introduced in SenateJul 21, 2015

Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015

Requires a federal agency to promulgate only a rule that is required by law, necessary to interpret a law, or made necessary by compelling public need.

Requires an agency, before promulgating a rule, to:

  • assess the significance of the problem the agency intends to address;
  • consider the legal authority under which the rule may be proposed;
  • examine whether existing rules have created or contributed to the problem and should be modified to achieve the regulatory objective more effectively;
  • assess available alternatives to direct regulation;
  • consider the risks posed by various substances or activities within the agency's jurisdiction;
  • design the rule to achieve the regulatory objective in the most cost-effective manner;
  • propose or adopt a rule only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs and select approaches that maximize net benefits;
  • base decisions on the best reasonably obtainable information concerning the need for, and consequences of, the rule;
  • assess alternative forms of regulation and specify performance objectives;
  • seek views of governmental entities before imposing regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect them and seek to minimize those burdens;
  • seek to harmonize agency action with related governmental functions;
  • avoid promulgating a rule that is inconsistent, incompatible, or duplicative with other rules;
  • tailor the rule to impose the least burden on society; and
  • draft the rule in a manner that is simple and easy to understand.

Directs each agency: (1) to issue rules through a process that involves public participation; (2) before issuing a notice of proposed rule making, to seek the views of those who are likely to be affected; (3) in developing regulatory actions and identifying appropriate approaches, to attempt to promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization and to identify means to achieve regulatory goals that are designed to promote innovation; (4) to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public, that include warnings, appropriate default rules, and disclosure requirements, and that provide information that is clear and intelligible; and (5) to ensure the objectivity of any scientific and technological information and processes used to support each regulatory action.

Principled Rulemaking Act of 2015 — Informed