Amendment sought to include a finding stating that the PHMSA Administrator testified at a Congressional hearing and said that the PHMSA had not done a study analyzing the risks associated with transporting diluted bitumen. The amendment also sought to require PHMSA to complete a review of the risks associated with transporting diluted bitumen, and whether current pipeline regulations are sufficient.

Ask AI
Amendment Number
722
Description
Amendment sought to include a finding stating that the PHMSA Administrator testified at a Congressional hearing and said that the PHMSA had not done a study analyzing the risks associated with transporting diluted bitumen. The amendment also sought to require PHMSA to complete a review of the risks associated with transporting diluted bitumen, and whether current pipeline regulations are sufficient.
Purpose
An amendment numbered 3 printed in House Report 112-181 to include a finding stating the PHMSA Administrator testified at a Congressional hearing and stated that the PHMSA had not done a study analyzing the risks associated with transporting diluted bitumen. Amendment would also require PHMSA to complete a review of the risks associated with transporting diluted bitumen, and whether current pipeline regulations are sufficient.
Congress
112
Type
HAMDT
Latest Action Date
Jul 26, 2011
Latest Action Text
On agreeing to the Eshoo amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 163 - 264 (Roll no. 642).
Latest Action Time
17:41:53
Submitted Date
Jul 26, 2011
Chamber
House of Representatives
Update Date
Dec 5, 2020
Amendment 722 — Informed