Amendment sought to require a GAO study of the number of primary care physicians that would be trained as a result of the funding provided in the health care overhaul law compared to the number of physicians that would be trained should funding be eliminated or rescinded.

Ask AI
Amendment Number
296
Description
Amendment sought to require a GAO study of the number of primary care physicians that would be trained as a result of the funding provided in the health care overhaul law compared to the number of physicians that would be trained should funding be eliminated or rescinded.
Purpose
An amendment numbered 2 printed in the Congressional Record to conduct a study of the number of primary care physicians that would be trained as a result of the funding provided in the health care overhaul law compared to the number of physicians that would be trained should funding be eliminated or rescinded.
Congress
112
Type
HAMDT
Latest Action Date
May 24, 2011
Latest Action Text
On agreeing to the Tonko amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 186 - 231 (Roll no. 336).
Latest Action Time
18:37:40
Submitted Date
May 24, 2011
Chamber
House of Representatives
Update Date
Dec 5, 2020
Amendment 296 — Informed