An amendment which authorizes only state regulatory commissions, as opposed to the FCC or local franchising authorities, to regulate cable rates if there is a lack of effective competition. The states would establish rate regulations governing cable systems that are not subject to effective competition, and such regulations could address rates for all cable services, not just rates for basic services. States also would be permitted to regulate the rates of cable systems owned or operated by a municipality, if such a system is the only one operating in the area. The amendment does not alter the bill's definition of effective competition.

Ask AI
Amendment Number
736
Description
An amendment which authorizes only state regulatory commissions, as opposed to the FCC or local franchising authorities, to regulate cable rates if there is a lack of effective competition. The states would establish rate regulations governing cable systems that are not subject to effective competition, and such regulations could address rates for all cable services, not just rates for basic services. States also would be permitted to regulate the rates of cable systems owned or operated by a municipality, if such a system is the only one operating in the area. The amendment does not alter the bill's definition of effective competition.
Purpose
Amendment sought to allow only State regulatory commissions the authority to regulate cable rates if there is a lack of effective competition in a State as determined by the FCC.
Congress
102
Type
HAMDT
Latest Action Date
Jul 23, 1992
Latest Action Text
On agreeing to the Oxley amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 83 - 327 (Roll no. 308).
Latest Action Time
18:27:51
Submitted Date
Jul 23, 1992
Chamber
House of Representatives
Update Date
Jun 7, 2021
Amendment 736 — Informed