Amendment104th Congress
Amendment sought to change the definition of a "major rule", which triggers the requirement for a Regulatory Impact Analysis, to a rule likely to result in an economic impact of at least $100 million annually, rather than the $50 million threshold provided in the bill.
- Amendment Number
- 242
- Description
- Amendment sought to change the definition of a "major rule", which triggers the requirement for a Regulatory Impact Analysis, to a rule likely to result in an economic impact of at least $100 million annually, rather than the $50 million threshold provided in the bill.
- Purpose
- An amendment to change the definition of a "major rule"--triggering the requirement of a Regulatory Impact Analysis--to a rule likely to result in an economic impact of at least $100 million annually. (The bill calls for a threshhold of $50 million annually.)
- Congress
- 104
- Type
- HAMDT
- Latest Action Date
- Mar 1, 1995
- Latest Action Text
- On agreeing to the Reed amendment (A013) Failed by recorded vote: 159 - 266 (Roll no. 185).
- Latest Action Time
- 16:46:05
- Submitted Date
- Mar 1, 1995
- Chamber
- House of Representatives
- Update Date
- Aug 15, 2021