Amendment clarifies the intent of an amendment offered by Rep. Velazquez and adopted by the Financial Services Committee by ensuring that public housing authorities that apply to HUD for "stop-loss" do not have their applications rejected on the basis that the management and related fees they establish pursuant to this bill are not reasonable as defined by HUD. Additionally, the amendment is a restatement of current law with respect to the ineligibility of illegal immigrants for assistance.

Ask AI
Amendment Number
956
Description
Amendment clarifies the intent of an amendment offered by Rep. Velazquez and adopted by the Financial Services Committee by ensuring that public housing authorities that apply to HUD for "stop-loss" do not have their applications rejected on the basis that the management and related fees they establish pursuant to this bill are not reasonable as defined by HUD. Additionally, the amendment is a restatement of current law with respect to the ineligibility of illegal immigrants for assistance.
Purpose
Amendment numbered 1 printed in House Report 110-524 clarifies the intent of an amendment offered by Rep. Velazquez and adopted by the Financial Services Committee by ensuring that public housing authorities that apply to HUD for "stop-loss" do not have their applications rejected on the basis that the management and related fees they establish pursuant to this bill are not reasonable as defined by HUD. Additionally, the amendment is a restatement of current law with respect to the ineligibility of illegal immigrants for assistance.
Congress
110
Type
HAMDT
Latest Action Date
Feb 26, 2008
Latest Action Text
On agreeing to the Sires amendment (A001) Agreed to by recorded vote: 415 - 0 (Roll no. 75).
Latest Action Time
14:46:15
Submitted Date
Feb 26, 2008
Chamber
House of Representatives
Update Date
Dec 5, 2020
Amendment 956 — Informed