Amendment110th Congress
Amendment sought to strike the development and implementation of the application review system, including the expert panel provision contained in the bill; and would have required all Head Start providers to face open competition at renewal time.
- Amendment Number
- 122
- Description
- Amendment sought to strike the development and implementation of the application review system, including the expert panel provision contained in the bill; and would have required all Head Start providers to face open competition at renewal time.
- Purpose
- An amendment numbered 7 printed in House Report 110-116 to strike the deve lopment and implementation of the application review system, including the expert panel provision. In addition, the amendment strikes designation when no entity has priority and instead designates competition--calling for the automatic recompetition for agency designation every five years, regardless of performance.
- Congress
- 110
- Type
- HAMDT
- Latest Action Date
- May 2, 2007
- Latest Action Text
- On agreeing to the Putnam amendment Failed by recorded vote: 161 - 262 (Roll no. 281).
- Latest Action Time
- 18:11:19
- Submitted Date
- May 2, 2007
- Chamber
- House of Representatives
- Update Date
- Feb 3, 2022